CHSN struggles to gain distribution foothold
The move back to free, over-the-air TV for sports is hitting road bumps
You would think making all games from the Chicago Blackhawks, Bulls, and White Sox available for free on broadcast television would be terrific for fans, right?
Well, you might want to think again.
Two weeks after the new Chicago Sports Network (CHSN) launched, the network is having distribution issues as Xfinity (the branded name Comcast uses to sell its products) has yet to get on board.
Like other regional sports networks, Comcast wants to put CHSN on a higher-paid tier while they want it on the basic tier, where the former NBC Sports Chicago was. Comcast has been moving RSNs to higher tiers as they did with Bally Sports and Seattle’s Root Sports. Negotiations are ongoing, but the Blackhawks season has already started, and the Bulls’ first regular season game is October 23 against New Orleans.
Despite gaining carriage on over-the-air TV via independent WJYS through their 62.2 and 62.3 subchannels, DirecTV, and Astound RCN, viewers on social media are still complaining about the lack of carriage on Xfinity and virtual carriers such as YouTubeTV.
Fans usually celebrate when their teams break away from the faltering RSN system by going through streaming, over-the-air, or both to distribute their games. But in Chicago, the situation is different. Despite all the noise of cord-cutting you’ve heard about, many homes in the Chicago area still subscribe to cable with one million estimated Xfinity customers in the nation’s third-largest television market. Unlike other major cities, Chicago proper was late to the cable TV game with wiring beginning in the mid-1980s and not being completed until the mid-1990s.
And unlike other cities where teams are striking deals with over-the-air stations for carriage, the move of Blackhawks, Bulls, and White Sox games to WJYS hasn’t been greeted with a lot of enthusiasm – for one, the former home shopping channels aren’t carried on any cable, satellite, or virtual providers. Second, many Chicago cable viewers refuse to buy antennas, feeling they don’t need or want to. Chalk it up to the failure of broadcasters, the FCC, and others to educate viewers about the 2009 transition from analog to digital TV.
Third, viewers who live in some apartment buildings in the Chicago area can’t easily switch to another provider because Comcast (or another cable or satellite company) has an exclusive deal to provide ISP services, usually baked into those leases residents sign. In 2019, a previously passed ordinance to let residents in San Francisco multi-unit apartment buildings choose their cable and ISP provider was vetoed by the FCC in a 3-2 partisan vote as cable companies and politically connected real estate owners objected.
Finally, even if viewers buy an antenna, pulling in 62.2 and 62.3 isn’t guaranteed as tropo conditions, trees, and even a building’s insulation can block signals from getting through, a problem in numerous Chicago highrises if the failure to get WBBM-TV’s digital signal when the conversion began was any indication.
Another problem is the lack of a direct-to-consumer app, as CHSN has yet to develop one. Marquee launched a DTC app three years after signing on.
Knowing the RSN model is in collapse, most fans blame CHSN for a lack of preparation, making these announcements weeks before launch. This is mainly because the principals behind the new channel—Jerry Reinsdorf and the Wirtzes—don’t have the best reputation among local sports fans, given the unflattering—and well-deserved—awful publicity each received in the last four years. It’s telling fans are not blaming Comcast for this, given their reputation is just as bad.
CHSN is working to expand its product reach to more homes and viewers. Negotiations are ongoing with Comcast, Hulu Plus Live TV, Fubo, and the continued development of the DTC app. But the network launch should have been much smoother.
Two other things worth noting about CHSN that I find odd:
1. Their website features lots of video clips, but unlike what NBCSN offered–there are no links to read articles or updated stats on the teams, league standings for the four major professional sports, and the NCAA with them already having a college football show (I hope they will do the same for college basketball.)
2. The studio. Love the look outside of the atrium with the Michael Jordan statue in the background. However, the lighting is barely visible–except for close shots where the lighting is good. Is it because fans looking through the glass won’t get blinded by the harsher lights, or is it just because they are starting out and looking for something that will stick?
Something to think about…
As we all know, trying to program any sports network 24/7 is going to be a challenge. At least, we have Marquee as an example on what filler programming will fit outside of the live games/pre and postgame shows. So far, “Pro Football Weekly” and some Wisconsin fishing show have carried over from NBCSN, but those shows air weekly. Hopefully, there will be plans to fill up some slots with some small, mid-major conferences in both football and basketball to fill up at least the weekend afternoons and some weekday evenings when the Hawks and/or the Bulls are either off are featured nationally.
In other words, just seeing a brief summary of their flagship shows isn’t going to cut it by the time the NFL regular season ends. In my opinion, hopefully we will get to see a one-stop shop for most things a Hawks, Bulls, and White Sox would want to see by the time Opening Day 2025 arrives, so we can see what type of setup they will have at Guaranteed Rate Field.
Sox marketing staff for years should have been let go! 90 miles from Chicago 1000 doesn’t come in & now mediacom extreme doesn’t have Sox, bulls or hawks! I’ve tried to listen to the Sox since Bob Elson the ol commander with the white owl wallop on WCFL when they cut power in the evening in the 50s. It’s now 2025 & it’s WORSE!!!!!